For example, sex otherwise government was particularly mutual of the one meme family each


For example, sex otherwise government was particularly mutual of the one meme family each

A more systematic analysis of the families’ cohesiveness based on T-Tests for the mean differences between generic attributes within and outside a meme families reaffirmed this tendency. We found significantly more common attributes between meme instances from the same family. In general, each instance shared more attributes with other family members (3.49) than with nonfamily members (2.39), T(18865) = , p < .01. This similarity between instances of the same family is significant in terms of content (T(6534) = , p < .01), participants (T(12755) = , p < .01), and form (T(16379) = 41.2, p < .01).

But really, while looking independently at the blogs, involvement, and you may means properties, there have been of a lot group with nonsignificant differences between the newest indicate interior and you will outside popular functions. It was particularly true for the content attribute. Just twelve away from 50 meme household common way more articles features during the nearest and dearest. Quite simply, blogs services was basically faster natural in most meme family members. At exactly the same time, when you look at the family members had been blogs is actually discovered to be alot more natural, it absolutely was including alot more unique and you will distinctive.

Furthermore, most meme families had male in addition to teen and you will younger adult users as their preferred enjoys. Other age groups, particularly elderly people, people, children, and children and additionally girls, stars, and particularly animal participants was basically way more unique to specific meme parents. Ultimately, in terms of setting, extremely meme family put straightforward picture having text or video clips. Meme group where means is a great deal more cohesive mutual remix and graphic control in addition to acronyms and you can wordplay.

The fresh new relationship between cohesiveness and you will individuality

The cohesiveness of meme families around more unique generic attributes already provided a partial answer to RQ4, regarding the link between cohesiveness and uniqueness in meme families, and a Pearson correlation between the two revealed a very strong and significant positive correlation (r = .911, p < .001). In other words, the more unique the shared attributes within a meme family, the higher the difference between shared attributes within and outside a meme family. When looking at each group of attributes separately, it was mainly the uniqueness of form (r = .870, p < .001) and content (r = .726, p < .001) attributes that positively correlated with family cohesiveness. The uniqueness of participation attributes had a weaker correlation with family cohesiveness (r = .366, p < .01).

Quiddities, concreteness, individuality, and cohesiveness

In response to the last research question, we found a significant positive correlation between quiddity concreteness and both the cohesiveness (r = .363, p < .01) and uniqueness (r = .431, p < .01) of Internet memes. In other words, a meme family with a more concrete quiddity was also more cohesive and unique in its generic attributes.

In particular, a significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of instances in a meme family sharing a similar object and the cohesiveness incontra vietnamiti (r = .286, p < .05) and uniqueness (r = .349, p < .05) of their content. This suggests that instances of meme families in which the quiddity is a specific object tend also to deal with the same unique themes. Thus, for example, instances of the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” family always included this specific character or object, and many of them also contained references to religion, which is a unique theme in the memetic sphere.

Meme families in which the quiddity is a character, such as “Charlie the Unicorn,” are more cohesive, but also unique in terms of participation. This is typically reflected in a higher percentage of instances containing animal participants. Perhaps less obvious is the negative correlation between action and uniqueness of participation (r = ?.329, p < .05). This means that the participants in meme families in which the main quiddity is an action are not unique, but rather part of the mainstream. Thus, for example, most participants of “Caramelldansen,” “The Evolution of Dance,” or “Planking” are teens or young adults.


Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *